Mexico v. Dep't of the Interior | No. 14-2219 | 10th Cir

Scribd es el sitio social de lectura y editoriales más grande del mundo. New Mexico then filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, which the district court denied. Following the denial of its motion, the State submitted comments and an alternative proposal to the Secretary. See Aplee.'s Br. at 14. 3. The State, and the Secretary joined by the Pojoaque, subsequently moved for summary judgment. The district court granted New Mexico's motion and denied that of the Filed: 2017-04-21 Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: 14-2219 Casino Communications With David Rebuck, Director New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement . Focus on iGames A new monthly section highlighting and analyzing the emerging internet gaming markets. The United Keetoowah Band tribal council unanimously passed a resolution to approach the Cherokee Nation for a joint council meeting between the two Nations, as a means of "offering the olive branch", in the words of the UKB Council. While a date was set for the meeting between members of the Cherokee Nation council and UKB representation, Chief Smith vetoed the meeting. Def. Council, 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984). Judge King joined the chief judge's opinion as to the justiciability issues, but would have found the statute ambiguous in light of Seminole Tribe, though she concurred that the regulations still should be invalidated but under Chevron step two. 497 F.3d at 511-12. Preliminary Injunction by District Judge Robert C. Brack at 1, filed October 7, 2015 (Doc. 32). Further, Judge Brack concluded that the public interest would be served by the preliminary injunction "maintaining the status quo for the duration of the appeal in New Mexico v. Freudenthal Ruling - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Mack Trucks, Inc., 820 F.2d 91, 94-95 (3d Cir. 1987) (injunction). SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The district court did not abuse its discretion when it imposed a $480,000 fine on William Fiore for failing to comply with EPA's Section 3013 order. Under RCRA, Fiore was liable for a maximum penalty of $1.2 million provided for in Section 3013(e), for his 240-day noncompliance with EPA's administrative Потребителски вход. ПОТРЕБИТЕЛ: ПАРОЛА: Влез Запомни ме | Регистрация

[index] [32867] [18196] [9649] [8668] [28556] [378] [1969] [21365] [7960] [1089]